Company insists innocence, distances itself from alleged illegal mining in forest reserves
Accra, Ghana — In the wake of the government’s move to revoke the mining license of Akonta Mining Ltd, the company has broken its silence with a firm statement denying any wrongdoing, stating categorically: “We are not responsible.”
The company, owned by Bernard Antwi Boasiako, popularly known as Chairman Wontumi, issued its official response days after the Ministry of Lands and Natural Resources announced plans to withdraw licenses over alleged illegal mining operations in the Tano Nimiri Forest Reserve in the Western North Region.
The Government’s Claim
The revocation effort follows months of public outcry and investigative reports suggesting that Akonta Mining engaged in mining activities in restricted forest areas without proper authorization. The Ministry cited violations of Ghana’s Minerals and Mining Act and non-compliance with environmental standards.
Lands Minister Samuel Abu Jinapor, in his statement, emphasized that no individual or company is above the law, and that protecting Ghana’s natural resources remains a top priority.
Akonta Mining Pushes Back: “Our Operations Were Lawful”
In a strongly worded press release on Wednesday, Akonta Mining refuted the allegations, describing the government’s claims as “unfounded” and “politically motivated.”
“Akonta Mining Limited has at all times conducted its operations within the remit of the law. We were granted prospecting and mining permits, and we have complied with all regulations required by the Minerals Commission and EPA,” the company stated.
They further argued that their presence in the Tano Nimiri Forest was based on a legally obtained permit, and claimed that no active mining occurred within protected boundaries at the time of the allegations.
Legal Battle Looms
The company’s legal team, led by Kwame Afriyie Esq., has hinted at seeking judicial redress to challenge the revocation, should the Minerals Commission proceed.
“The actions by the Ministry are premature and legally contestable. We will explore all legal avenues to protect our image and investment,” said Mr. Afriyie.
He also emphasized that no formal hearing was conducted with Akonta Mining before the public announcement — a move they deem procedurally flawed.
Public, Environmentalists, and Chiefs React
While the company asserts its innocence, environmental advocates and local chiefs in the affected areas remain unconvinced. Many residents blame Akonta Mining and other operators for the destruction of river bodies, farmland, and biodiversity.
Nana Kwame Anane, a chief in Sefwi Wiawso, said:
“We have seen the damage with our own eyes. Whether permitted or not, the forests have suffered.”
EcoWatch Ghana, a civil society group, responded to Akonta’s denial:
“The burden of proof lies not in paperwork alone but in environmental responsibility. The satellite images don’t lie.”
Political Overtones?
The situation is further complicated by Chairman Wontumi’s high-profile political status within the ruling New Patriotic Party (NPP). Critics have suggested that the government’s move may reflect deeper internal rifts or a bid to demonstrate impartiality in its anti-galamsey campaign.
Political analyst Dr. Ama Osei-Antwi commented:
“This is as much a legal battle as it is a political test. If Akonta Mining is guilty, enforcement must be swift. But if innocent, this could expose weaknesses in regulatory transparency.”
What’s Next?
As the standoff between Akonta Mining and the government intensifies, the Minerals Commission is expected to finalize its revocation procedures in the coming days. Meanwhile, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is reportedly conducting a fresh audit of mining activity in the forest region.
Stakeholders from all sides — including traditional authorities, civil society, and political figures — are watching closely.
Public Reactions Online
Social media has erupted with opinions, split between those supporting the government’s action and others questioning the timing and motive behind the decision.
- @Justice4Forests: “Denial doesn’t clean rivers. Let the courts decide, but let’s stay honest about the environmental cost.”
- @KofiInvestorGH: “Selective enforcement? Or real justice? If Akonta Mining is clean, then this is a travesty.”
- @AkosuaEnviro: “Akonta’s response only makes the case for stronger oversight. Permits without responsibility are meaningless.”
Conclusion
As both parties prepare for what could be a landmark legal and political showdown, one thing is certain: the debate surrounding Akonta Mining is no longer just about permits — it is about how Ghana navigates the intersection of economic development, environmental conservation, and political integrity.
